Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The rapid and effective identification of pathogens in patients with pulmonary infections has posed a persistent challenge in medicine, with conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) proving time-consuming and less sensitive, hindering early diagnosis of respiratory infections. While there has been some research on the clinical performance of targeted sequencing technologies, limited focus has been directed toward bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). This study primarily evaluates the pathogen detection capabilities of nanopore-targeted sequencing (NTS) in BALF, providing a comprehensive analysis. The retrospective study, spanning from January 2022 to November 2023, includes 223 patients exclusively sourced from a single center. We conducted a detailed comparative analysis among NTS, targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS), and CMTs. Initially, we compared the detection capabilities of NTS and tNGS and found no significant differences in their sensitivity and specificity. Specifically, we observed that the sensitivity of NTS was significantly higher than that of CMTs (74.83% vs 33.11%,
Ye et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: