Abstract PO4-10-03: Relationship Between Insurance Status and Breast Cancer Care in Young Mexican Women

Abstract BACKGROUND In Mexico, 71% of the population is covered by public health insurance, while 2% are privately insured and 27% are uninsured. Previous studies have demonstrated differences in breast cancer (BC) care according to type of healthcare coverage in the United States and Latin America. Most studies have observed that privately insured patients are diagnosed at earlier stages, have less symptom-to-diagnosis and treatment delays, and have better overall outcomes. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate whether differences in BC care exist among young women with breast cancer (YWBC), ≤40 years at diagnosis, depending on their insurance status in Mexico. METHODS Data was collected from the Mexican prospective cohort of YWBC Joven 0.001). No difference was found on the distribution of BC subtypes among both groups. A total of 573 (94%) patients had registered information regarding the time from symptom onset to contacting a medical professional. Only 18 (3%) were diagnosed with imaging studies (5% and 3% with private and public coverage, respectively). More privately insured patients (95%) contacted a healthcare professional during the first 3 months since symptom onset than publicly insured patients (74%) (p=0.003). Information regarding the time from contacting a healthcare professional to treatment start was available for 472 (78%) patients. There was no difference in the proportion of patients who started treatment ≤3 months after arriving with a healthcare professional according to type of health insurance (76% private vs. 67% public coverage; p=0.2). The majority of patients (96%) considered having adequate support from the medical staff (100% private vs. 94% public). Compared to those with public coverage, more privately insured patients perceived receiving adequate information about their treatment (79% private vs. 50% public; p 0.001). There were no differences between groups regarding the perceived quality of information regarding their diagnosis (p=0.06) and continuous BC care (p=0.6). CONCLUSION Patients with private coverage were diagnosed at earlier stages, reported contacting a healthcare professional earlier, and perceived receiving adequate information regarding their treatment more often than patients with public coverage. These results coincide with previously reported differences between patients with private and public health insurance. Interestingly, there were no differences between the delays from the first visit to treatment initiation and perceived support from the medical staff depending on type of healthcare coverage. Given the observed differences between privately and publicly insured patients, population-based interventions to increase awareness of alarm signs for BC and widespread access to quality patient education resources could help decrease the disparities between these groups. Table 1. Clinicopathologic features of BC depending on insurance status Citation Format: David G Gonzalez-Sanchez, Arantxa Ramirez-Cisneros, Alejandra Platas, Alejandra Platas, Daniela Vazquez-Juarez, Fernanda Mesa-Chavez, Ana Ferrigno, Alejandro Mohar, Alan Fonseca, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza. Relationship Between Insurance Status and Breast Cancer Care in Young Mexican Women abstract. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-10-03.