Abstract PO4-01-08: Co-expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki67 in a single breast cancer cell indicates a favorable prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer

Abstract Background: ER-positive breast cancer is biologically and clinically divided into two subtypes: luminal-A and luminal-B. This classification is mainly based on the status of cellular proliferation. At least two different pathways drive cellular proliferation in ER-positive breast cancer. One is a classical pathway where ER binds to estrogen responsive element (ERE), which leads to the expression of downstream molecules, including PR. The other is a non-classical pathway where a complex of ER and relevant factors bind to different sites than ERE. Growth factor signaling has been suggested to potentiate a non-classical pathway. We hypothesized that examining PR status in ER-positive proliferating cells could tell which pathway is more dominant in ER-positive breast cancer. Methods: To test the hypothesis, we used a newly developed triplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) that detects three molecules simultaneously under bright-field microscopy. Postmenopausal patients who were treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors from January 2007 to September 2016 at Saitama Cancer Center were included in this study. ER, PR, and Ki67 expressions were assessed in a single slide using the triplex IHC assay with anti-ER antibody (clone SP1), anti-PR antibody (clone 1E2), and anti-Ki67 antibody (clone 30-9). ER, PR and Ki67 expression was assessed in a single cell nucleus of cancer cells (567 to 4871 cells) from multiple areas in each case. An ER-positive proliferating cell was defined as an ER-positive and Ki67-positive cell. PR status in ER-positive proliferating cells was assessed. When PR was expressed in more than 50% of ER-positive proliferating cells in a clinical case, the tumor was categorized as the PR-positive group. Luminal A and luminal B breast cancers were defined based on the pre-treatment Ki67 labeling index with a cut-off of 14 %. Statistical analyses included the Mann-Whitney test, the log-rank test, and the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Pre-treatment tissues from 55 patients were evaluated. The median age was 62 (range: 54 to 80) years. The patients were grouped into PR-positive and PR-negative groups. The two groups had no differences in age and pre-treatment T and N stages. The median pre-treatment Ki67 labeling index was 5.9 % in the PR-positive group and 9.9 % in the PR-negative group, which showed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.01). Clinical response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy was compared, and no difference was observed. The median post-treatment Ki67 labeling index was 3.6 % in the PR-positive group and 13.1 % in the PR-negative group with a significant difference (P = 0.035). The survival was compared between the two groups. The PR-positive group showed a significantly more favorable disease-free survival (DFS) than the PR-negative group (P = 0.0079). To adjust for the background differences including Ki67 and PR status, a multivariate analysis was performed and showed that the PR-positive group had a significantly better DFS than the PR-negative group independent of clinical stage, Ki67 labeling index, and PR status (P = 0.042). Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was also better in the PR-positive group than in the PR-negative group after adjusting for clinical stage, Ki67 labeling index, and PR status (P = 0.043). Interestingly, among patients with luminal A tumors, those in the PR-positive group showed a better DFS than those in the PR-negative group (P = 0.022). Conclusion: PR status in ER-positive proliferating cells was an independent prognostic factor in DFS and BCSS and divided patients with luminal A tumors further into two prognostic groups. Citation Format: Takayuki Ueno, Rie Horii, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Makiko Ono, Yurina Maeshima, Hiroaki Nitta. Co-expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki67 in a single breast cancer cell indicates a favorable prognosis in ER-positive breast cancer abstract. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-01-08.