Baltic States’ EU membership: discursive search for (and failure to obtain) farewell from Russia

The article assesses the EU membership of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania with a special focus on their attempts, already as EU members to change their relations with Russia, which remains their 'significant Other'. We employ the discourse-historical analysis and focus on the evolution of the Baltic strategic discourse towards three themes, particularly contested by Russia, including the domestic interethnic issues, politics of memory and the elements of the constitutional identities of three Baltic States. First, with references to the EU context, we introduce several landmark cases of the Baltic confrontation with Russia which occurred prior to 2014 ('pre-Crimea'). Then we analyze the corpus of official documents from three Baltic states (2011 - December 2023), including their government programs, national security strategies, Constitutions and programs of their EU Council Presidencies (2013 Lithuania, 2015 Latvia and 2017 Estonia). Discourse analysis reveals how cautionary attitudes from the Baltic States are linked with their historical experiences of the Soviet occupation and with their prudent assessment of the EU as a security guarantee. We conclude that 20 years after the Baltic EU accession, their relations went through the full circle and since 'post-Crimea' downgraded from pragmatic partnership to animosity which makes Baltic-Russian reconciliation ontologically impossible.