Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Emerging technologies are increasingly employed in environmental citizen science projects. This integration offers benefits and opportunities for scientists and participants alike. Citizen science can support large-scale, long-term monitoring of species occurrences, behaviour and interactions. At the same time, technologies can foster participant engagement, regardless of pre-existing taxonomic expertise or experience, and permit new types of data to be collected. Yet, technologies may also create challenges by potentially increasing financial costs, necessitating technological expertise or demanding training of participants. Technology could also reduce people's direct involvement and engagement with nature. In this perspective, we discuss how current technologies have spurred an increase in citizen science projects and how the implementation of emerging technologies in citizen science may enhance scientific impact and public engagement. We show how technology can act as (i) a facilitator of current citizen science and monitoring efforts, (ii) an enabler of new research opportunities, and (iii) a transformer of science, policy and public participation, but could also become (iv) an inhibitor of participation, equity and scientific rigour. Technology is developing fast and promises to provide many exciting opportunities for citizen science and insect monitoring, but while we seize these opportunities, we must remain vigilant against potential risks. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Towards a toolkit for global insect biodiversity monitoring’.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Julie Koch Sheard
Tim Adriaens
Diana E. Bowler
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
University of Florida
University of Bristol
Technical University of Munich
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sheard et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6b7f0b6db643587638bd4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0106
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: