Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Neurodisability describes a broad range of heterogenous conditions affecting the brain and/or the neuromuscular system that result in functional limitations including cognitive, sensory, and motor impairments. Children with neurodisability have complex health and educational needs. They are likely to achieve below-expected levels in measures of school attainment and require special educational needs provision. While the educational outcomes of children with specific conditions under neurodisability have been investigated previously, there is little evidence on the collective outcomes of population or the progression of their attainment throughout primary school. This study aims to describe educational attainment and attainment trajectories by the end of primary school for children in England with neurodisability recorded in hospital records, compared to their peers. Methods We will use the Education and Child Health Insights from Linked Data (ECHILD) database, which links educational and health records across England. We will define a primary school cohort of children who were born in National Health Service funded hospitals in England between 1st September 2003 and 31st August 2008, who were enrolled in reception of a state-funded primary school at age 4/5 years. Children with neurodisability will be identified using diagnostic and procedure codes recorded from birth to the end of primary school (age 11) in hospital admission records. We will describe educational outcomes at reception (Early Years Foundation Stage Profile, age 4/5), year two (key stage one, age 6/7), and year six (key stage two, age 10/11) for three groups of children: those with an indicator of neurodisability first recorded before the beginning of primary school, those with an indicator of neurodisability first recorded during primary school, and those without a record of neurodisability before the end of primary school. We will additionally explore the variation in educational outcomes between these groups, accounting for socioeconomic and demographic characteristics.
Cant et al. (Wed,) studied this question.