Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Patients with persistent air leak (PAL) pose a therapeutic challenge to physicians, with prolonged hospital stays and high morbidity. There is little evidence on the efficacy and safety of bronchial valves (BV) for PAL. Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases to identify studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of BV for PAL. We calculated the success rate (complete resolution of air leak or removal of intercostal chest drain after bronchial valve placement and requiring no further procedures) of BV for PAL in individual studies. We pooled the data using a random-effects model and examined the factors influencing the success rate using multivariable meta-regression. Results: We analyzed 28 observational studies (2472 participants). The pooled success rate of bronchial valves in PAL was 82% (95% confidence intervals, 75 to 88; 95% prediction intervals, 64 to 92). We found a higher success rate in studies using intrabronchial valves versus endobronchial valves (84% vs. 72%) and in studies with more than 50 subjects (93% vs. 77%). However, none of the factors influenced the success rate of multivariable meta-regression. The overall complication rate was 9.1% (48/527). Granulation tissue was the most common complication reported followed by valve migration or expectoration and hypoxemia. Conclusion: Bronchial valves are an effective and safe option for treating PAL. However, the analysis is limited by the availability of only observational data.
Damaraju et al. (Wed,) studied this question.