Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background Physicians are experiencing an increasing burden of messaging within the electronic health record (EHR) inbox. Studies have called for the implementation of tools and resources to mitigate this burden, but few studies have evaluated how these interventions impact time spent on inbox activities. Objective Explore the association between existing EHR efficiency tools and clinical resources on primary care physician (PCP) inbox time. Design Retrospective, cross-sectional study of inbox time among PCPs in network clinics affiliated with an academic health system. Participants One hundred fifteen community-based PCPs. Main Measures Inbox time, in hours, normalized to eight physician scheduled hours (IB-Time 8 ). Key Results Following adjustment for physician sex as well as panel size, age, and morbidity, we observed no significant differences in inbox time for physicians with and without message triage, custom inbox QuickActions, encounter specialists, and message pools. Moreover, IB-Time 8 increased by 0.01 inbox hours per eight scheduled hours for each additional staff member resource in a physician’s practice ( p = 0.03). Conclusions Physician inbox time was not associated with existing EHR efficiency tools evaluated in this study. Yet, there may be a slight increase in inbox time among physicians in practices with larger teams.
Bundy et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: