Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Several human sciences stand at a crossroads, where the robustness of their findings is increasingly questioned due to the narrow demographics of their study samples, on top of others practice (e.g., statistics, transparency). Much of the published research indeed focuses solely on WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) populations and convenience samples, often recruited from university settings, without adequately addressing or cautioning about the generalizability of the results. This paper discusses the urgent need to expand the demographic range of research participants and outlines crucial steps and guidelines to include a wider array of human populations. Such efforts are essential to improve the generalizability and relevance of human sciences research worldwide.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Emilie A. Caspar (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6b149b6db64358763302b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/knjm3
Emilie A. Caspar
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: