Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Prognosis of Chronic Chagasic Cardiomyopathy (CCC) patients depends on functional and clinical factors. Bradyarrhythmia requiring pacemaker is a common complication. Prognosis of these patients is poorly studied, and mortality risk factors are unknown. We aimed to identify predictors of death and to define a risk score for mortality in a large cohort of CCC patients with pacemaker. Methods It was an observational, unicentric and prospective study. The endpoint was all-cause mortality. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of death and to define a risk score. Bootstrapping method was used to internal score validation. Results We included 555 patients and after a mean follow-up of 3.7±1.5 years, 100 (18%) deaths occurred. Predictors of death were: right ventricular dysfunction (HR hazard ratio 2.24; 95%CI 1.41–3.53; P = 0.001); heart failure class III or IV (HR 2.16; 95% confidence interval 95%CI 1.16–4.00; P = 0.014); renal disease (HR 2.14; 95%CI 1.24–3.68; P = 0.006); left ventricular end-systolic diameter > 44mm (HR 1.97; 95%CI 1.26–3.05; P = 0.003); atrial fibrillation (HR 1.94; 95%CI 1.25–2.99; P = 0.003) and cardiomegaly on X-ray (HR 1.87; 95%CI 1.10–3.17; P = 0.020). The score identified patients with: low (0–20 points), intermediate (21–30 points) and high risk (>31points). The optimism-corrected C-statistic of the predictive model was 0.751 (95% CI 0.696–0.806). Internal validation with bootstrapping revealed a calibration slope of 0.946 (95% CI 0.920–0.961), reflecting a small degree of over-optimism and C-statistic of 0.746 (95% CI 0.692–0.785). Conclusions This study identified predictors of mortality in CCC patients with pacemaker defining a simple, validated and specific risk score.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Giselle de Lima Peixoto
Sérgio Siqueira
Silvana Nishioka
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
Universidade de São Paulo
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Peixoto et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6ada0b6db64358762fa59 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012114
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: