Comparison of Hemodynamic Effect of Propofol and Ketofol during Induction of Anaesthesia in General Surgery Patients

Objective: To determine the comparison of homodynamic effect of propofol and ketofol duringinduction in general surgery patients.Study design: Randomized control trialSetting: Department of Anesthesia, Surgical ICU and Pain management, Civil Hospital Karachi.Duration: Seven months from June 2019 to January 2020.Methods: Patients scheduled for elective general surgery procedures, aged 20 to 60 years, bothmale and female patients were included. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups.Group A received a combination of ketofol while Group B received propofol as the inductionagent. After recording of the base line values of mean arterial pressure patient was induced usingpropofol or ketofol. Mean arterial pressure readings were noted at 30 seconds after druginjection, as well as at 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes after intubation, to capture theimmediate hemodynamic effects of the drugs and to observe any potential changes over timefollowing intubation.Results: The average age of the patients was 37.38±13.78 years. Out of 64 patients, 30(46.9%)were male and 34(53.1%) were female. Homodynamic effect was significantly high in thosepatients who received ketofol than those who received propofol (100% vs. 59.4% p=0.0005).The findings observed also with significant differences in hemodynamic effects between the twogroups, even after controlling for age, gender, and ASA classification (p-0.05).Conclusion: Combination of Ketofol with ketofol was observed to be the betterhemodynamically as compared to Propofol. Additionally, the use of ketofol reduces the cost ofinduction and decreasing the economic burden on the patient.