Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This article relies on the intellectual framework of “national role conceptions” to explain Nigeria's wide‐ranging international obligations. Although Nigeria has a rich foreign policy literature, this framework is rarely directly employed in analyzing the country's many external engagements and the motives behind them. Nigeria has always assumed international roles that are in tandem with its fundamental foreign policy objectives. These roles are inspired by the identities that the country has constructed and projected for itself overtime and the expectations of peers (or other actors). Nigeria's constructive external engagements and role performance notwithstanding, there have been some misalignments. These include the sorry state of Nigeria's foreign missions, domestic contradictions, and the fact that Nigeria has sometimes behaved sluggishly in its role performance. This work recommends that Nigeria's diplomatic missions must be adequately financed, the domestic contradictions leading to disputation over foreign policy roles must be addressed, and Nigeria must overcome its occasional complacencies in Africa.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Segun Oshewolo
Roseline F. Oniemola
Ademola Azeez
World Affairs
Afe Babalola University
Federal College of Education, Kano
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Oshewolo et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6aec4b6db643587630de0 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/waf2.12023
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: