Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background and Aim Following treatment of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), surveillance for a second primary malignancy (SPM) is necessary. However, detailed evidence regarding the timing and prognosis of SPMs is insufficient. We aimed to clarify the details of SPMs and their effects on patient outcomes. Methods This retrospective, multicenter study involved 11 hospitals. Patients with superficial ESCC curatively resected using endoscopic submucosal dissection between May 2005 and December 2012, were included in this study. Results The 5‐year survival rate of 187 patients was 92.6% during a median follow‐up duration of 96.8 months. Thirty‐one patients died, 14 of whom died of SPMs. Compared to patients with SPMs detectable by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), patients with SPMs detectable only by modalities other than EGD had a significantly higher mortality rate ( p < 0.001). Patients with second primary lung cancer (LC) had a high mortality rate (56.3%). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that multiple Lugol‐voiding lesions (LVLs) tended to be associated with SPMs ( p = 0.077, hazard ratio HR 4.43, 95% confidence interval CI: 0.91–6.50), and metachronous ESCC was an independent risk factor for the incidence of second primary LC ( p = 0.037, HR 3.51, 95% CI: 1.08–11.41). Conclusions SPMs that cannot be detected by EGD, such as LC, must be considered after the curative resection of ESCC. We suggest strict screening by both EGD and computed tomography for patients with multiple LVLs or metachronous ESCC to detect SPMs in their early stages.
Tajiri et al. (Wed,) studied this question.