Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Over the past 50 years, consumer researchers have presented extensive evidence that consumer preference can be swayed by the decision context, particularly the configuration of the choice set. Importantly, behavioral research on context effects has inspired prominent quantitative research on multialternative decision-making published in leading psychology, management, economics, and general interest journals. While both streams of research seem to agree that context effects are an important research area, there has been relatively limited interaction, communication, and collaboration between the two research camps. In this article, we seek to initiate an active dialogue between the two sides. We begin by providing a critical overview of the two literatures on context effects, discussing both their strengths and weaknesses, as well as disparities and complementarities. Here, we place particular emphasis on deepening consumer researchers’ understanding of context effects by drawing on prominent quantitative research published in non-marketing journals over the last decades. Importantly, we provide a roadmap for the future that can inspire further research and potential collaborations between the two camps, overcoming silos in knowledge creation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ioannis Evangelidis
Universitat Ramon Llull
Sudeep Bhatia
University of Pennsylvania
Jonathan Levav
Bloomberg Philanthropies
Journal of Consumer Research
Stanford University
University of Pennsylvania
Universitat Ramon Llull
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Evangelidis et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e69ff0b6db64358762338d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad028