Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Bispecific T-cell engagers (bsTCEs) have emerged as a promising class of cancer immunotherapy. BsTCEs enable physical connections between T cells and tumor cells to enhance T-cell activity against cancer. Despite several marketing approvals, the development of bsTCEs remains challenging, especially at early clinical translational stages. The intricate design of bsTCEs makes their pharmacologic effects and safety profiles highly dependent on patient's immunological and tumor conditions. Such context-dependent pharmacology introduces considerable uncertainty into translational efforts. In this study, we developed a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) model, through context unification, that can facilitate the translation of bsTCEs preclinical data into clinical activity. Through characterizing the formation dynamics of immunological synapse (IS) induced by bsTCEs, this model unifies a broad range of contexts related to target affinity, tumor characteristics, and immunological conditions. After rigorous calibration using both experimental and clinical data, the model enables consistent translation of drug potency observed under diverse experimental conditions into predictable exposure-response relationships in patients. Moreover, the model can help identify optimal target-binding affinities and minimum efficacious concentrations across different clinical contexts. This QSP approach holds significant promise for the future development of bsTCEs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xiaozhi Liao
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Timothy Qi
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jiawei Zhou
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liao et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e69ff0b6db643587623659 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3302
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: