Surgical treatment for recurrent patellar dislocation with severe torsional deformities: Double‐level derotational osteotomy may not have a clear advantage over single‐level derotational osteotomy in improving clinical and radiological outcomes

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether double-level (femur + tibia) derotational osteotomy is superior to single-level femoral derotational osteotomy for recurrent patellar dislocation with severe femoral and tibial rotational deformities (femoral anteversion >30° and external tibial torsion >30°). METHODS: Between January 2015 and June 2020, a total of 115 knees with recurrent patellar dislocation treated with combined medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) and derotational osteotomies were evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Among these cases, 15 knees that underwent double-level derotational osteotomy were included in the double-level group, which was propensity-matched in a 1:2 ratio to a single-level group of patients who underwent single-level femoral derotational osteotomy (30 knees). The clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated and compared between the groups. Furthermore, the foot progression angle was measured preoperatively and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: The patient-specific variables did not differ significantly between the double- and the single-level groups after propensity score matching. The postoperative mean foot progression angle was significantly lower in the double-level group than in the single-level group (9° ± 8° vs. 15° ± 11°; p = 0.014); however, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of any other clinical and radiological assessments. CONCLUSION: For patients with severe femoral and tibial torsional deformities (femoral anteversion >30° and external tibial torsion >30°), the double-level derotational osteotomy is superior to single-level osteotomy in maintaining normal foot progression angle, but it does not show an advantage in terms of patient-reported outcomes, radiological results and redislocation rate at minimum 2 years of follow-up. Furthermore, concomitant excessive external tibial torsion (>30°) did not have an adverse effect on clinical outcomes in patients who underwent derotational distal femoral osteotomy with MPFL-R due to excessive femoral anteversion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.