Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
DB-02 (NCT03523585) is a randomized, open-label, phase III trial of T-DXd vs TPC in pts previously treated with T-DM1 for HER2+ mBC. At primary study analysis (data cutoff DCO, Jun 30, 2022), T-DXd showed statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and OS vs TPC. We report updated efficacy and safety results (DCO, Sep 29, 2023), including OS. Pts with HER2+ mBC were randomly assigned 2:1 to T-DXd or TPC (trastuzumab + capecitabine cap or lapatinib + cap). This analysis includes OS, PFS, PFS from time of randomization to the progression on next line of therapy or death (PFS2) by investigator, and safety. 608 pts were randomized (T-DXd, n = 406; TPC, n = 202). At DCO, median (range) follow-up (F/U) was 30.2 mo (0.8-60.7) with T-DXd and 20.5 mo (0.0-60.6) with TPC. In the T-DXd and TPC arms, 86.4% and 100% of pts discontinued treatment, respectively; primary reason was progressive disease (47.8%, 73.8%). Median (95% CI) OS was 35.7 mo (30.9-40.8) with T-DXd vs 25.0 mo (20.4-31.5) with TPC. Median PFS2 was 33.0 mo (T-DXd) vs 15.0 mo (TPC). Additional results are in the table. T-DXd was received as poststudy anticancer treatment by 12.9% of pts (32/248) in the T-DXd arm and by 46.6% (69/148) in the TPC arm. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) associated with discontinuation occurred in 21.5% of pts with T-DXd and 9.7% with TPC. There were 46 (11.4%) adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis cases with T-DXd; 4 since primary DCO (2 grade 1; 2 grade 2).Table: 182MOUpdated efficacy and safetyT-DXd n = 406TPC n = 202mPFSa (95% CI), mo16.7 (14.7-19.6)5.5 (4.4-6.8)HR (95% CI)0.30 (0.24-0.37)mPFS2a (95% CI), mo33.0 (28.6-36.6)15.0 (13.0-18.1)HR (95% CI)0.42 (0.33-0.53)mOS (95% CI), mo35.7 (30.9-40.8)25.0 (20.4-31.5)HR (95% CI)0.69 (0.55-0.86)Pts with events, n (%)211 (52.0)119 (58.9)24-mo OS rate, % (95% CI)64.6 (59.6-69.2)51.9 (44.4-58.9)36-mo OS rate, % (95% CI)49.2 (44.0-54.3)36.6 (29.5-43.8)T-DXd n = 404TPC n = 195mTreatment duration, mo (range)11.3 (0.7-60.7)∼4.5 (0.1-50.6)Any-grade TEAEs, n (%)403 (99.8)185 (94.9)Grade ≥3 TEAEs, n (%)224 (55.4)87 (44.6)Serious TEAEs, n (%)114 (28.2)46 (23.6)m, median; aBy investigator assessment. Open table in a new tab m, median; aBy investigator assessment. Results reinforce the substantial benefit of T-DXd over TPC in pts with HER2+ mBC previously treated with T-DM1, demonstrated by clinically meaningful improvement in OS, PFS, and PFS2. The safety profile of T-DXd continues to be manageable, with no long-term toxicity observed with longer F/U.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
S-B Kim
Fabrice André
Toshimi Takano
ESMO Open
University of Padua
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Institut Gustave Roussy
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kim et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6c339b6db643587642813 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103204