Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
IMpassion050 (NCT03726879) showed no increase in pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0/is ypN0) rates for neoadjuvant A + PH + CT vs. placebo (pbo) + PH + CT in the intention-to-treat (ITT) or PD-L1+ populations in patients (pts) with high-risk HER2+ eBC. Safety was consistent with that of A in other combination studies. We report descriptive long-term efficacy and safety. Pts with a primary tumour >2 cm and histologically confirmed positive lymph node status were randomised 1:1 to A/pbo + PH + CT. After surgery, pts continued A/pbo + PH up to 1 yr. Pts with residual disease could switch to A/pbo + trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for 14 cycles. Secondary endpoints: disease-free survival (DFS; time from surgery to disease recurrence or death); event-free survival (EFS; time from randomisation to disease recurrence, tumour progression or death); safety. Stratification: stage at diagnosis; hormone receptor (HR) status; PD-L1 status.Table: 127PDFS (N = 434 217 per arm; pts who had surgery)EFS (N = 454 226 A, 228 pbo; ITT population)3-yr event-free rate, % (95% confidence interval CI)A: 92.9 (89.5, 96.4) Pbo: 88.5 (84.1, 92.8)A: 91.4 (87.7, 95.1)Pbo: 89.0 (84.8, 93.2)Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.71 (0.38, 1.32)Unstratified0.90 (0.50, 1.59)StratifiedCovariates, hazard ratio (95% CI)Stage at diagnosisT20.38 (0.13, 1.06)0.56 (0.24, 1.34)T3–T41.13 (0.50, 2.56)1.33 (0.60, 2.94)HR status+0.43 (0.17, 1.13)0.57 (0.24, 1.36)–1.07 (0.46, 2.53)1.28 (0.58, 2.82)PD-L1 status+1.38 (0.51, 3.69)1.67 (0.65, 4.32)–0.44 (0.19, 1.02)0.58 (0.27, 1.22)pCR statusNon-pCR0.71 (0.31, 1.63)0.95 (0.45, 1.98)pCR0.66 (0.26, 1.70)0.76 (0.30, 1.88) Open table in a new tab At data cut-off (24 Aug 2023), 411/454 pts (90.5%) remained on-study (A arm: 206/226; pbo arm: 205/228); median follow-up was 44.2 and 43.4 months, respectively. A median of 14 PH cycles was given in both arms. DFS/EFS, including subgroup analyses, are shown in the table. There were 24 deaths (A arm: 11; pbo arm: 13). In the adjuvant phase (A vs. pbo), more pts had adverse events of special interest (AESIs; 59.4% vs. 47.0%); there were no grade 5 AESIs; and the most common AEs (in ≥10% pts in either arm) were radiation skin injury (24.0% vs. 19.4%), arthralgia (20.7% vs. 17.1%) and diarrhoea (20.7% vs. 13.4%). Although there was no increase in pCR rates, 3-yr DFS/EFS rates were numerically improved with A in the ITT population, including in pts with PD-L1–negative, HR+ or stage T2 disease. Safety was consistent with the known profiles of PH, T-DM1 and A. These results highlight the value of long-term clinical endpoints when investigating early-stage cancer immunotherapies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jens Huober
C.H. Barrios
Naoki Niikura
ESMO Open
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Roche (Switzerland)
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Huober et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6c316b6db643587641874 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103115