Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Chronic drinking can lead to alcohol-induced cardiomyopathy (ACM), a disease currently without a cure. Using a mouse model of ACM, we observed significant cardiac dysfunction after 30 days. Our study’s goal was to investigate the potential restoration of cardiac function following a period of abstinence. Our hypothesis is that abstinence can lead to an observable recovery in overall cardiac function. C57BL/6J mice were given the Lieber-DeCarli liquid diet with 5% ethanol for 30 days, with two ethanol binges on days 10 and 30 (5 g/kg). After the 30-day ethanol exposure, the mice were transitioned to an ethanol-free diet for an additional 30 days. Left ventricular catheterization and echocardiography were conducted at the 30- and 60-day timepoints. 30 days of ethanol consumption led to significant decreases in both systolic and diastolic function. However, following a period of alcohol abstinence, there was a marked improvement. Specifically, the 30-day ethanol mice exhibited increases in stroke work and dP/dt max after 30 days of abstinence; stroke work increased from 1119 ± 89 mmHg*μL to 2032 ± 139 mmHg*μL (p < 0.0001), and dP/dt max increased from 8054 ± 664 mmHg/s to 11967 ± 449 mmHg/s (p < 0.001). Diastolic function also improved; dP/dt min from -7711 ± 561 mmHg/s to -10202 ± 594 (p < 0.01). We also found a significant increase in load-independent cardiac contractility, i.e. the slope of end systolic pressure volume relation: 6.89 ± 0.6 mmHg/μL to 10.59 ± 1.57 mmHg/μL (p < 0.05). In conclusion, abstinence after chronic ethanol exposure can lead to a restoration of cardiac function in C57BL/6J mice. This model parallels limited clinical data on abstinence and will allow us to study the underlying mechanisms responsible for the restoration of function. R21AA029747 (JG, CB), F30AA030472 (JE). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Edavettal et al. (Wed,) studied this question.