Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Blockchain technology has gained momentum due to its immutability and transparency. Several blockchain platforms, each with different consensus protocols, have been proposed. However, choosing and configuring such a platform is a non-trivial task. Numerous benchmarking tools have been introduced to test the performance of blockchain solutions. Yet, these tools are often limited to specific blockchain platforms or require complex configurations. Moreover, they tend to focus on one-off batch evaluation models, which may not be ideal for longer-running instances under continuous workloads. In this work, we present BlockCompass , an all-inclusive blockchain benchmarking tool that can be easily configured and extended. We demonstrate how BlockCompass can evaluate the performance of various blockchain platforms and configurations, including Ethereum Proof-of-Authority, Ethereum Proof-of-Work, Hyperledger Fabric Raft, Hyperledger Sawtooth with Proof-of-Elapsed-Time, Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance, and Raft consensus algorithms, against workloads that continuously fluctuate over time. We show how continuous transactional workloads may be more appropriate than batch workloads in capturing certain stressful events for the system. Finally, we present the results of a usability study about the convenience and effectiveness offered by BlockCompass in blockchain benchmarking.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mohammadreza Rasolroveicy
IBM (Canada)
Wejdene Haouari
York University
Marios Fokaefs
York University
IEEE Transactions on Computers
York University
IBM (Canada)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rasolroveicy et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e68e94b6db643587616521 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.2024.3404103
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: