Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background Surgical drains are a key component for recovery in breast reconstruction procedures. However, they are often cumbersome and carry a risk of infection with prolonged use. We aimed to develop a more thorough understanding of patient and health care provider perspectives on surgical drains, to inform future efforts in improving the breast reconstruction patient experience. Methods Twenty-nine breast reconstruction patients and eight plastic surgery providers were recruited to complete surveys focused on surgical drains. Likert scales ranging from 1 to 5 were developed to gauge how bothersome drains felt, as well as concern for infection. Ordinal variable and categorical multiple-choice analyses were applied as appropriate. Results Fifteen (51.7%) patients underwent implant-based breast reconstruction, and 14 (48.3%) patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction. The most common duration of drain placement was 2 weeks (N = 13). The surgical site infection (SSI) rate requiring antibiotics was 28% (N = 8). On a scale of 1 to 5, both patients (median = 3) and providers (median = 2.5) viewed drains as bothersome. Patients were “frequently” concerned about infection risk (median = 3). Other high-frequency patient concerns included general pain and discomfort. Conclusion Surgical drains are a common component of breast reconstruction procedures and are viewed as cumbersome by both patients and providers. Patients expressed concerns about drain site pain, discomfort, and tugging on clothing. Patients and providers both believed that drains could contribute to SSI. Overall, these data provide insight to drive future improvements in the patient drain experience.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
William M. Tian
Jess D. Rames
Brooke E. Schroeder
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
University of California, San Diego
Duke University
Mayo Clinic
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tian et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e68bf8b6db643587613a48 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2332-0444