Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Matching models with contracts have been extensively studied in the last years as a generalization of the classical matching theory. Matching in networks is an even more general model in which firms trade goods via bilateral contracts constituting a supply chain. Hatfield and Kominers (2012 Matching in networks with bilateral contracts, Am. Econ. J., Microecon. 4(1), 176–208, doi:10.1257/mic.4.1.176) showed that a natural substitutability condition characterizes the maximal domain of firm preferences for which the existence of stable allocations is guaranteed in such a model, if the set of all existent contracts is acyclic. Moreover, they asserted that these conditions are sufficient to obtain a suitable lattice structure for the set of all stable allocations. In this paper, we exhibit an inconsistency in the last point through an example, and introduce an additional condition over firm preferences that allows to recover an appropriate lattice structure.
Garces et al. (Thu,) studied this question.