Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Background and Aims Overhydration is considered a significant risk factor for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in end-stage kidney disease patients. Measurement of total and extracellular water with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), inferior vena cava diameter (IVCd) measurement, and circulating pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (proBNP) levels have previously been tested as possible indicators of volume status in hemodialysis (HD) patients, with BIA showing the most potential. Recently, it has been shown that lung ultrasound (LUS)-guided volume depletion is an effective strategy for relieving lung congestion in chronic HD patients. The aim of our study was to determine whether performing LUS on only 8 places was comparable to the regular 28 places. Method LUS was performed on 29 randomly selected patients before their regular HD procedure in 28 regular places and correlated with 8 places (4 on each side). In addition, BIA with a body composition monitor (BCM) was performed, IVCd was measured using ultrasound and serum NT-proBNP value was determined. Statistical analysis was performed using a commercially available SPSS® for Windows® (version 29.0; Chicago, IL, USA). Spearman's non-parametric test was used to determine a correlation between variables. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results We included 29 chronic HD patients, 15 male (51.7 %), with a mean age of 66.3 ± 12.5 years and a median dialysis vintage of 53.0 (95% CI (40.9, 100.6)) months. Most patients (96.6 %) had a functional arteriovenous fistula, whereas only one patient (3.4 %) was dialysed using a Hickman catheter. A very strong, directly proportional correlation was found between performing LUS in 28 and 8 places (ρ=0.909; p0.001). A significant moderate correlation was also found between both LUS in 28 and 8 places and systolic blood pressure (ρ=0.503; p=0.005 and ρ=0.467; p=0.011, respectively) (Table 1). Neither of the LUS methods statistically correlated with other tested volume markers – overhydration, intracellular and extracellular volume measured with BIA, IVCd in inspiration and expiration and IVC index, or serum NT-proBNP levels. Conclusion In our study, we found a very strong, positive, and significant correlation between performing LUS in 28 regular places and 8 places. Both also moderately correlated with systolic blood pressure. However, we did not find a statistically significant correlation between LUS and other tested volume markers.
Varda et al. (Wed,) studied this question.