The effect of bachmann bundle pacing on diastolic function in patients with non-obstructive HCM

Abstract Background and Objective Patients with non-obstructive HCM (nHCM) have advanced diastolic dysfunction and atrial remodeling, leading to increased heart failure hospitalisations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of Bachmann bundle pacing (BBP) in diastolic filling compared to right atrial appendage pacing (RAAP). Methods Forty patients with symptomatic nHCM and normal LV function were prospectively enrolled from January 2021 to June 2023. Inclusion criteria included electrocardiographic evidence of inter-atrial delay, E/e’ 15, and an indication for ICD implantation. BBP was attempted in twenty patients, others underwent RAAP. A Biotronik Selectra 3D 40-S sheath was used for BBP in patients in whom initial lead implantation was unsuccessful. BBP was defined based on P-wave morphology and fluoroscopic lead position. The RV lead was implanted in the RV apex in all patients and the AV delay was optimized based on diastolic filling period and E/e’. Devices were programmed in DDD mode. During follow up, diastolic function, functional capacity, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure hospitalisations were assessed in both groups. Results Among the forty patients (age 48.2+7.8 yrs, males 75%, ESC-SCD Risk 4.3+0.6%), the baseline P wave duration, E/A, E/e’ were 138.4+16.4 ms, 2.5+0.5, and 17.5+2.4, respectively. Six patients (15%) had a history of paroxysmal AF (3 each in BBP and RAAP groups). Of the 16 patients (80%) who underwent successful BBP, the Selectra 3D 40-S sheath was used in 8 patients (Figure 1, Panel A). During BBP, a bachmann bundle potential was recorded in 7 of 16 patients (43.8%) (Figure 1, Panel C). The pacing threshold (1.5+0.5@0.4ms vs. 0.9+0.3@0.4ms, p=0.026) was higher and the atrial sensing (1.8+0.4 vs. 3.3+0.6, p=0.002) was lower in the BBP group compared to the RAAP group at 4 weeks and 6 months of follow up. There was an acute rise in threshold (2.1@0.4 ms) in 1 BBP patient at 4 weeks of follow up. Patients in the BBP group had a reduction in P wave duration compared to the patients in the RAAP group (-22.5 + 5.4 vs. +5.6 + 3.2 ms, p0.001). During follow up (11.4 + 3.4 months), there was a significant improvement in diastolic function (E/e’), functional capacity (NYHA Class) and reduction in NT-proBNP in the BBB group compared to the RAAP group (Figure 1). The percentage of atrial pacing was similar in both groups (BBP 73.2 + 7.8 vs. RAAP 78.5 + 9.1 %, p=0.219). The risk of atrial fibrillation/tachycardia (12.5% vs. 35.0%, p=0.022) and heart failure hospitalisations (6.3% vs. 20%, p=0.042) was lower in the BBP group compared with RAAP during follow up. Conclusions BBP is safe and effective in improving diastolic function, functional capacity and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with nHCM.BBP Pacing using Selectra 3D 40-S SheathChange in E/e', NYHA, and NT-pro BNP