Left atrial low-voltage area is associated with poor rhythm outcome and poor efficacy of left atrial additional ablation in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation

Abstract Background Although left atrial additional ablation other than pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is often performed in order to modify arrhythmogenic substrate, rhythm outcome in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LS-PerAF) is still challenging. Left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) is correlated with degeneration of atrial myocardium, and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following catheter ablation. However, in patients with LS-PerAF, the association between the prevalence of LVAs and rhythm outcome has not been clarified. We hypothesized that AF recurrence after AF ablation more frequently occurred in patients with LVAs than in those without, and that the prevalence of LVAs was associated with the efficacy of left atrial additional ablation. Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the prevalence of LVAs and rhythm outcome or efficacy of left atrial additional ablation in patients with LS-PerAF ablation. Methods In total, 123 (age, 66 ± 9 years; female, 28 23%) consecutive patients who underwent initial ablation for LS-PerAF were included. Left atrial additional ablation was defined as an ablation for left atrium other than PV isolation and ablation for non-PV foci. The definition of LVAs was sites with a bipolar voltage of 0.5 mV covering ≥5 cm² of left atrium. Rhythm outcome after the catheter ablation was followed for 24 months. Results LVAs was found in 31 (25%) patients, and left atrial additional ablation was performed for 31 (25%) patients. Freedom from AF recurrence was significantly lower in patients with LVAs than in those without (Figure 1A). In contrast, freedom from AF recurrence was similar between patients with left atrial additional ablation and those without (Figure 1B). In patients without LVAs, freedom from AF recurrence was significantly higher in patients with left atrial additional ablation than in those without (Figure 2A). On the contrary, in patients with LVAs, freedom from AF recurrence during was similar between patients with left atrial additional ablation and those without (Figure 2B). Conclusions In patients undergoing LS-PerAF ablation, AF recurrence more frequently occurred in patients with LVAs than in those without. Only in patients without LVAs, freedom from AF recurrence was significantly higher in patients with left atrial additional ablation than in those without.Figure 1Figure 2