Assessing Political Bias in Large Language Models

The assessment of societal biases within Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged as a critical concern in the contemporary discourse surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) ethics and their impact. Especially, recognizing and considering political biases is important for practical applications to gain a deeper understanding of the possibilities and behaviors and to prevent unwanted statements. As the upcoming elections of the European Parliament will not remain unaffected by LLMs, we evaluate the bias of the current most popular open-source models concerning political issues within the European Union (EU) from a German perspective. To do so, we use the "Wahl-O-Mat", a voting advice application used in Germany, to determine which political party is the most aligned for the respective LLM. We show that larger models, such as Llama3-70B, tend to align more closely with left-leaning political parties like GR\"UNE and Volt, while smaller models often remain neutral, particularly in English. This highlights the nuanced behavior of LLMs and the importance of language in shaping their political stances. Our findings underscore the importance of rigorously assessing and addressing societal bias in LLMs to safeguard the integrity and fairness of applications that employ the power of modern machine learning methods.