Unraveling the transcriptomic landscape of platelets: RPs vs. MPs in CCS patients

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Else Kröner Fresenius Stiftung Background Reticulated platelets (RPs), characterized by youth, hyper-reactivity, and RNA abundance, signify pro-thrombotic potential and serve as predictors for inadequate antiplatelet therapy response post-myocardial infarction. Their pivotal role in chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and high on-treatment platelet reactivity highlights their significance as promising biomarkers for adverse cardiovascular events in diverse pathological settings. Purpose We aimed to compare for the first time the transcriptomic profiles of RPs and MPs in CCS patients. Methods Using fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS), RPs and MPs were isolated based on RNA content from peripheral blood of 19 CCS patients. RNA assessment involved the Tapestation 4200 platform (Agilent), and totalRNA libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq 500 Illumina platform. RNA sequencing analysis, with a cut-off of p 0.005 and a log2fc 1, and alternative splicing event detection using MAJIQ, were performed. Circular RNA (circRNA) analysis employed CIRCexplorer. Results Total RNA-sequencing identified 1589 differentially expressed genes, with 1100 transcripts upregulated in RPs and 489 enriched in MPs (Figure 1 A, B and D). Notably, collagen receptor GP6 (log2FC 1.12, p=6.89x10-41), thrombin receptor PAR4 (F2RL3, log2FC 1.1, p=3.54*10-21) and Von Willebrand Factor (log2FC 1.2, p=1.26*10-38) transcripts were significantly enriched in RPs. Gene Ontology identified a higher enrichment of relevant biological categories in RPs compared to MPs, such as "platelet activation", "platelet degranulation" and "blood coagulation" (Figure 1C). These findings are consistent with our previously established discovery and support the hypothesis that RPs in cardiovascular disease are hyper-reactive and pro-thrombotic due to their different RNA content compared to other platelets. Several splicing events were detected as differentially regulated: there is an upregulation of an alternative splicing on the collagen receptor transcript GP6 in RPs (Figure 1E); by the transcript of the G-protein GNAQ, one alternative splicing event was found upregulated in RPs, whilst two others were upregulated in MPs. Moreover, we found an enrichment of the total level of circular RNAs in MPs as compared to RPs (Figure 1F). Several previously undescribed circular RNAs were discovered to be enriched in RPs, as shown in Figure 1F. Conclusion This groundbreaking transcriptomic profiling of RPs and MPs in CCS patients elucidates the biological basis for RPs' hyperreactivity, emphasizing the differential enrichment of platelet activation transcripts. The pronounced upregulation of prothrombotic signaling in RPs provides insight into their hyperactivity and correlation with cardiovascular events. These findings illuminate a novel therapeutic niche in CCS patients, although further investigations are essential to comprehend the detrimental role of RPs in coronary artery disease.