Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Objective: To explore the effect of bundled nursing intervention on lung cancer patients with a high risk of PICC-related thrombosis. Methods: Eighty-six PICC patients were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group of 43 patients each. The control group received general nursing care and the observation group received bundled nursing intervention based on the control group. The occurrence of venous thrombosis, quality of life score, Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) score, self-rating anxiety (SAS) score, and nursing satisfaction after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results: The incidence rate of PICC-related venous thrombosis in the observation group (2/4.652%) was lower than that of the control group (13/30.231%) after nursing intervention (P < 0.05). After the intervention, the quality-of-life scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P < 0.001). After the intervention, the SDS and SAS scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group (P < 0.001). The nursing satisfaction rate of the observation group (41/ 4.652%) was higher than that of the control group (35/18.604%) (P < 0.05). The difference is statistically significant. Conclusion: In the care of lung cancer patients with a high risk of PICC-related thrombosis, bundled nursing care achieved better results.
Meng et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: