Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The role of IPR's ability in the progress of society is undisputable. Such protections are be instrumental in making surethat adequate investment in terms of money and time are made for food security and sustainable agriculture ecosystem.Revolutionary technologies of genetic transformation leading to the products like genetically modified crops (GM) haveglamorized an otherwise rustic industry. There is a general consensus in relation to the complexity of the issue and grantinggene patents which in themselves (isolation) are worthless. Only in conjugation with complex biological system of a plantcan they show their effect. Super crops are now possible through various plant biotechnological interventions to obtain thedesired traits by changing the genome of plants. Such techniques are research intensive and demand high investment,hence legal protection through intellectual property rights is imperative. But it is complicated to grant a patent orsimilar monopoly on plant genetic resources as it has direct implications on food affordability and security especially indeveloping countries. Additionally, giant seed companies of developed countries have gained many patents on genes ofplants, misappropriating the plant genetic resources of poor or undeveloped countries which are rich in biodiversity givingrise to biopiracy. The purpose of the article is to examine the legal framework for gene patenting in reference to plant varietyprotection (PVP) in India.
Reddy et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: