Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Rein Vihalemm has defined the concept of φ-sciences primarily through scientific models, while emphasising that they are empirical sciences. His specification of such sciences includes references to Galileo, Kant, and Heidegger, but lacks in detail and, most notably, fails to explicate how the models of these sciences are linked to the material world they aim to describe. I first analyse Galileo’s theoretical proceedings in terms of preplanning, the essence of phaenomena, and mathematicity, which can either explicitly or implicitly be viewed as important characteristics of φ-sciences, acknowledged by Vihalemm. Based on this new clarification and additional sources, I will then explore φ-scientific measurement as the link between models and matter and discuss whether Galileo’s own measurements can be regarded as such.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ave Mets (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66722b6db6435875f31ff — DOI: https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2024.1.01
Ave Mets
Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum
University of Tartu
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...