Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Family Planning (1968), a short, animated film featuring Donald Duck, was translated into at least twenty-four languages and viewed in the span of two years by nearly 1.4 million people around the world. Commissioned by the Rockefeller’s Population Council and expensively produced by Disney, the movie represents the international family planning industry’s single largest investment in a media object. It has since been perceived as largely effective in achieving its goal of promoting contraception to culturally diverse audiences. Using an unusually rich collection of archival records and other previously neglected sources, we demonstrate how Family Planning failed to connect with local viewerships. Our historical analysis recovers the Population Council’s homogenizing and infantilizing view of the global poor and critiques of this view that emanated from the Global South – not just with the benefit of hindsight but at the time. We conclude that the Rockefeller–Disney collaboration was ill-suited for communicating to a heterogeneous, global audience, and that a misplaced optimism in animation as a universal language all but guaranteed failure.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Patrick Ellis
Jesse Olszynko-Gryn
Journal of Global History
University of Tampa
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ellis et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e664a3b6db6435875f0cf7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1740022824000068
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: