Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
595 Background: Neoadjuvant therapy significantly enhances the likelihood of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in breast cancer patients. However, in ER-positive and HER-2 negative breast cancer, the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is not as good as HER-2 positive or triple-negative breast cancer. In addition, with the evolution of multi-gene assays, many patients of this subtype may not require adjuvant chemotherapy. This study explores the potential of tailored neoadjuvant treatments (NCT or endocrine therapy (NET)) guided by 70-gene assay (Mammaprint, Agendia) to improve BCS rates in ER-positive/HER-2 negative breast cancer. Methods: A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted across four Korean centers from 2019 to 2023. Participants were clinical stage II-IIIA, ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients deemed unsuitable for BCS. Suitability was further verified by an independent three-surgeon panel using mammography or MRI. Out of 130 screened patients, 100 were enrolled. We analyzed 90 patients, excluding 10 cases; 2 with a basal type or HER2 type result in the blueprint, 7 who refused neoadjuvant therapy, and 1 who underwent surgery at another hospital. Before initiation of therapy, each surgeon recorded a target tumor size at which the surgeon would be able to do BCS considering location of the tumor and patient’s breast size. Based on the 70-gene assay results from core needle biopsies, high-genomic-risk patients received NCT (anthracycline + cyclophosphamide for 4 cycles, followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel), while low-risk patients underwent 16 weeks of NET with letrozole (±leuprolide for premenopausal women). Results: Out of the patients, 66 (73%) were high-genomic-risk and underwent NCT, while 24 (27%) received NET. Median tumor size was 3.7cm (85.6% clinical T2 and 14.4% T3/4). The primary endpoint, achieving the pre-established target tumor size for BCS, was reached by 70.0% (95% CI: 59.4-79.2%) of patients, significantly surpassing the set goal of 50.8% (a 15% increase from historical control). The rates were 74.2% for NCT and 58.3% for NET. The actual BCS rate was 58.9% overall (63.6% for NCT and 45.8% for NET). Clinically, 5.6% exhibited complete response (CR), 74.4% partial response (PR), 18.8% stable disease (SD), and 1.1% progressive disease (PD). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved in 2.2% (all in the NCT group). No severe adverse events beyond expectations were observed. No pre-treatment clinical or pathological factor was significantly predictive for the BCS conversion. Conclusions: For ER positive, HER2 negative breast cancer patients initially ineligible for BCS, the use of pre-treatment multi-gene assays to guide selective NCT or NET could substantially increase BCS rates and reduce unnecessary chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03900637 .
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wonshik Han
Eunhye Kang
Hong Kyu Kim
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Seoul National University
University of Ulsan
Asan Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Han et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66c5ab6db6435875f771e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.595