Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has captured global attention recently, prompting the need to understand how associated risks are perceived. This paper attempts to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive overview of the topic, focusing especially on the most problematic area of Artificial Narrow Intelligence. Utilising a systematic literature review, we examined 64 studies focusing on both statistical and qualitative aspects of AI risk perceptions. This research shows that current publications focus on Asia and North America, with the number of publications increasing significantly over the last three years. Research focuses primarily on three domains: Health, consumer behaviour and finance. This study has identified key factors that influence AI risk perceptions, including familiarity, trust and privacy, while also recognising confounding variables such as gender and political orientation. Still, one crucial shortcoming in existing literature emerges: While numerous studies examine how AI risk perceptions are conceived, there is a lack of systematic research on the formation of these perceptions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jonas Benjamin Krieger
United Nations University Institute on Globalization, Culture and Mobility
Frédéric Bouder
University of Stavanger
Matthias Wibral
Maastricht School of Management
Journal of Risk Research
Maastricht University
University of Stavanger
United Nations University – Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Krieger et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e65d18b6db6435875eb7cc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2024.2350725
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: