Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
e20000 Background: The FDA has approved selpercatinib and pralsetinib for the treatment of metastatic RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer in adult patients. Although the overall response rate is high and the response is durable, the outcomes may vary due to different fusion types of the same driver gene. Methods: We retrospectively collected and analyzed 14062 samples (tumour tissue or plasma) from Chinese lung cancer patients who underwent tissue-based or ctDNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays at HaploX Genomic Sequencing Center from May 18, 2020, to January 11, 2024. All samples with a RET gene fusion were included and classified based on the fusion partner gene and breakpoint position. Results: A total of 157 (1.1%) samples with DNA-based NGS harbored a RET gene fusion. Among the samples with a RET gene fusion, the most common RET fusion partners at the DNA level were KIF5B (73.2%) and CCDC6 (21.0%). We categorized RET fusions into canonical fusions and noncanonical fusions based on fusion partner and breakpoint position, and the proportions of canonical fusions and noncanonical fusions were 88.5% (139/157) and 11.5% (18/157) respectively. Among the samples with a noncanonical RET fusion, 5 samples harbored a RET fusion with an uncommon fusion partner, it remains unclear whether these fusions lead to RET activation. Conclusions: In this retrospective study, we identify different types of RET fusions in Chinese lung cancer patients. The majority are canonical fusions, which can benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clinical, the rest are noncanonical fusions, and their role in precision therapy needs further verification by RNA-based NGS or other assays. All in all, our research helps guide precision therapy in clinical settings. Table: see text
Lin et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: