Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
10611 Background: The nutraceutical market is a multi-billion dollar industry. Studies show many cancer patients turn to vitamins and nutraceutical supplements, seeking health improvements post-diagnosis. Despite their popularity, the efficacy & safety of most substances remains unverified through clinical trials. Additionally, interaction with cancer treatments could potentially increase toxicities or diminish chemotherapy effects. In response, our Cancer Center initiated a comprehensive program aimed at enhancing informed decision-making. This involved conducting surveys to understand patient’s attitudes, knowledge, and perceptions about supplement use, alongside evaluating the impact of an educational intervention designed to encourage the discontinuation of self-prescribed vitamins and supplements during cancer treatment. Methods: We utilized a structured survey with open-closed-ended questions to assess dietary supplement use among cancer patients. The survey featured multiple-choice and 1-5 Likert scale questions covering supplement types (e.g., vitamins, minerals, herbs), reasons for use, duration, and timing of use, and beliefs about safety & efficacy. Clinicians also reviewed disclosed non-prescription supplements, advising on their continuation or cessation. Our goal was to understand patient perspectives on supplement use pre & post-educational intervention, among new patients undergoing oral or systemic cancer treatment. We analyzed changes in supplement use with McNemar’s Exact Tests for paired proportions. Results: Following the educational intervention with 144 cancer patients, the proportion not using any supplements rose from 44.4% to 50.0%, hinting at a trend towards discontinuing supplement use. Yet, McNemar’s tests for various supplement categories revealed no statistically significant changes (p>0.05). Of the 73 patients taking supplements and evaluated post-education by a physician, 53.4% were permitted to continue (primarily vitamins), 26% agreed to stop, and 20.5% reaffirmed they would not discontinue use. Of the resistant patients choosing to continue despite medical advice, 93.3% were taking high-dose vitamins, 20% minerals, and 13% herbs/botanical compounds. Conclusions: Supplements are heavily marketed as promoting various anticancer benefits. Our study shows the challenging nature of modifying cancer patients' perceptions. Despite a modest uptick in stopping, a significant portion persisted supplement use post-education, highlighting entrenched beliefs & attitudes. This emphasizes the importance of ongoing, tailored discussions within oncology care to reduce the risks associated with unsupervised supplement use. Our results advocate for incorporating longer-term educational strategies about supplements, underscoring the critical need for evidence-based guidance in managing their use among cancer patients.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rubal Sharma
Staten Island University Hospital
Laura Longo
Policlinico Universitario di Catania
Maureen Gonzalez
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Staten Island University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sharma et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e671c0b6db6435875fc14e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.10611
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: