Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) requires swift intervention, with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) being essential to limit myocardial damage. The key factor affecting PCI effectiveness is the door-to-balloon (DTB) time. This observational study evaluated DTB times in STEMI patients at a tertiary care center who underwent primary angioplasty, examining adherence to benchmarks and identifying factors contributing to delays. Methodology This prospective observational study was conducted from March 2017 to August 2018 at Fortis Hospital Mulund, Mumbai, India. It included 171 STEMI patients aged 18 and older who underwent primary angioplasty. Patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), those who received thrombolysis, or had medical contraindications to primary angioplasty were excluded. Data on key time intervals were collected via direct observation and then analyzed using SPSS for Windows, Version 15 (Released 2006; SPSS Inc., Chicago, United States). Qualitative data were summarized using frequency and percentages, whereas quantitative data were presented as mean (±SD). T-test was applied to compare the mean duration between the two groups, i.e., DTB time ≤90 minutes and DTB time >90 minutes, and a p-value 90 minutes had significantly longer durations in all procedural steps except door-to-ECG time. Conclusion This study underscores the complex challenges in achieving timely DTB times for STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty. Overcoming these barriers through targeted interventions is essential for optimizing management and enhancing outcomes. Insights into delay factors inform evidence-based strategies to improve the timeliness and effectiveness of STEMI care delivery.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Keyur B. Shah
Sandeep Gore
Vivek Solapure
Cureus
Pramukhswami Medical College
Fortis Hospital
Mahatma Gandhi Mission's Dental College and Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shah et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e650bab6db6435875e159b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.62222