Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Recently, there has been growing attention on behalf of both academic and practice communities towards the ability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems to operate responsibly and ethically. As a result, a plethora of frameworks and guidelines have appeared to support practitioners in implementing Trustworthy AI applications (TAI). However, little research has been done to investigate whether such frameworks are being used and how. In this work, we study the vision AI practitioners have on TAI principles, how they address them, and what they would like to have - in terms of tools, knowledge, or guidelines - when they attempt to incorporate such principles into the systems they develop. Through a survey and semi-structured interviews, we systematically investigated practitioners' challenges and needs in developing TAI systems. Based on these practical findings, we highlight recommendations to help AI practitioners develop Trustworthy AI applications.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
María Teresa Baldassarre
D Gigante
Marcos Kalinowski
University of Bari Aldo Moro
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Baldassarre et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e64b29b6db6435875dba8f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3661167.3661214
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: