Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Data collected in the real world often encapsulates historical discrimination against disadvantaged groups and individuals. Existing fair machine learning (FairML) research has predominantly focused on mitigating discriminative bias in the model prediction, with far less effort dedicated towards exploring how to trace biases present in the data, despite its importance for the transparency and interpretability of FairML. To fill this gap, we investigate a novel research problem: discovering samples that reflect biases/prejudices from the training data. Grounding on the existing fairness notions, we lay out a sample bias criterion and propose practical algorithms for measuring and countering sample bias. The derived bias score provides intuitive sample-level attribution and explanation of historical bias in data. On this basis, we further design two FairML strategies via sample-bias-informed minimal data editing. They can mitigate both group and individual unfairness at the cost of minimal or zero predictive utility loss. Extensive experiments and analyses on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods in explaining and mitigating unfairness. Code is available at https://github.com/ZhiningLiu1998/AIM.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhining Liu
Urbana University
Ruizhong Qiu
Urbana University
Zhichen Zeng
Urbana University
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
IBM (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liu et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5b130b6db64358754a22d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3637528.3671797