Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract: The role and importance of each country in the world economy are in direct dependence on how much it owns high technology. Engineering is what makes technology possible and the flexibility in the nature of this engineering and the type of engineers trained to solve complexities facing our world is of paramount importance. Engineering education is developing as a link in the system of continuous education and is intended to meet the needs of the individual, society and state in the training of specialists with a high level of professional competence and mobility. Aristotelian-based engineering science is not prepared to tackle modern complexities affecting our world today because it is limited in mechanics and scope, it also does not understand this because it is empirical analytical-based. A new type of engineering science that can foresee such occurrences, understand its microphysics and mechanics, even predict them and craft suitable engineering-based preparedness (along with suitable systems technologies for tackling them) lies in the integration of the Transdisciplinary scientific logic and process, the in between and hidden third that today’s engineering science does not consider. This new engineering can only be achieved through the consideration of a Transdisciplinary chair which would infuse Transdisciplinary culture in academia. The case of this new engineering systems science is used for substantiating the call for a Transdisciplinary chair and an aspect of Transdisciplinary systems engineering used for unifying entropy and order, to produce intelligence explained as further evidence.
Ndubuisi Idejiora-Kalu (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: