Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract To adapt to the complex belowground environment, plants make trade-offs between root resource acquisition and defence ability. This includes forming partnerships with different types of root associating microorganisms, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal fungi. These trade-offs, by mediating root chemistry, exert legacy effects on nutrient release during decomposition, which may, in turn, affect the ability of new roots to re-acquire resources, thereby generating a feedback loop. However, the linkages at the basis of this potential feedback loop remain largely unquantified. Here, we propose a trait-based root ‘acquisition-defence-decomposition’ conceptual framework and test the strength of relevant linkages across 90 angiosperm tree species. We show that, at the plant species level, the root-fungal symbiosis gradient within the root economics space, root chemical defence (condensed tannins), and root decomposition rate are closely linked, providing support to this framework. Beyond the dichotomy between arbuscular mycorrhizal-dominated versus ectomycorrhizal-dominated systems, we suggest a continuous shift in feedback loops, from ‘high arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis-low defence-fast decomposition-inorganic nutrition’ by evolutionarily ancient taxa to ‘high ectomycorrhizal symbiosis-high defence-slow decomposition-organic nutrition’ by more modern taxa. This ‘acquisition-defence-decomposition’ framework provides a foundation for testable hypotheses on multidimensional linkages between species’ belowground strategies and ecosystem nutrient cycling in an evolutionary context.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jiajia Zheng
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Grégoire T. Freschet
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Leho Tedersoo
Hudson Institute
Nature Communications
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zheng et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e63c11b6db6435875cde2c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49666-3
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: