Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract: Does Gulliver's apparent equiphilia (love for equines) at the conclusion of Jonathan Swift's satire signify madness or misanthropy? I say neither, and propose that the neighing narrator is a satirical figure encompassing the animal debate between Michel de Montaigne and René Descartes. Swift's satire, I argue, addresses the early-modern controversy over human-animal distinctions by dramatizing a profound skepticism toward human reason. Swift's stance is registered in a vacillation between literalization of human-animal conversations, lampooning Montaigne, and satirizing Cartesian mechanism. I conclude that the greatest paradox of Gulliver's Travels is that Swift's satirization of skepticism is an endorsement of skepticism itself.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dana Laitinen (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e712a7b6db64358768b31d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2024.a930338
Dana Laitinen
Philosophy and literature
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...