Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the development of Indonesian law in the digital era, focusing on the impact of technology on the legal and judicial system, law enforcement challenges, and personal data protection.. Theoretical Framework: This research is grounded in theories of legal modernization and cyberlaw. The study examines how technological advancements influence legal structures and practices, providing a solid basis for understanding the evolution of Indonesia's legal system in the digital age. Method: The methodology adopted for this research comprises a qualitative, descriptive-analytical approach. Data collection was conducted through literature reviews of journals, books, legal regulations, and reports from related institutions. Results and Discussion: The results revealed significant changes due to technology, including the digitization of legal documents, the establishment of e-courts, and the development of cyberlaw, which have increased efficiency and accessibility. However, challenges such as the classification of cyber offenses and inadequate regulations to keep pace with technological advancements were identified. The discussion contextualizes these findings within the theoretical framework, highlighting the implications and relationships identified, and considers potential discrepancies and limitations of the study. Research Implications: The practical and theoretical implications of this research include insights into improving legal processes and law enforcement in the digital era. These implications could impact regulatory frameworks and law enforcement practices in Indonesia.. Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the transformative impact of technology on the Indonesian legal system. The originality of the research is evidenced by its focus on contemporary legal challenges and regulatory gaps in the digital era, offering valuable insights for policymakers and legal practitioners.
Harianti et al. (Mon,) studied this question.