Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The article is the result of a study of the development of the administrative dispute system in Russia, in particular, the allocation of judicial and extrajudicial administrative disputes. The constitutional provisions on the separation of branches of government create conditions for the independent existence of judicial and extrajudicial administrative disputes on the one hand and the emergence of links between these two types of disputes on the other. According to the authors, the system of resolving judicial and extrajudicial administrative disputes is anchored by the general principles of resolving such disputes. Goals and objectives of the study. The purpose of the work is to resolve the issue of the possibility of combining a judicial and an out-of-court dispute, namely, the consistent application of an out-of-court (pre-trial), and then a judicial form of legal protection. Methods. The study used systematic, logical, formal and legal methods. Results, brief conclusions. According to the results of the study, it was concluded that the systemic resolution of the issues raised is possible only with the adoption of two comprehensive legislative acts: on the resolution of judicial administrative disputes and on the resolution of extrajudicial administrative disputes. However, before the adoption of new legal norms, the coordinated application of universal and special administrative procedural principles will allow courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts to resolve individual disputes about the ratio of judicial and extrajudicial administrative disputes.
Zyuzin et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: