Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Modern advancements in laboratory and instrumental techniques in astrobiology have improved our life detection capabilities on both Earth and beyond. These advancements have also increased the complexity of data often resulting in data sets that are characterized by complex and non‐linear relationships. Machine learning methods are underutilized in astrobiology; however, these methods are extremely effective at revealing structure and patterns in complex data sets when paired with the right algorithms. Here, we employ a series of classification and regression algorithms to predict the abundance of organic carbon (OC) from X‐ray fluorescence (XRF) heavy element (>Mg) data in dynamic Mars‐analog hypersaline lake sediments. More specifically, we constructed models using the random forest, k‐nearest neighbors (KNN), support vector machine, and logistic regression algorithms. Overall, our trained models showed good performance with predicting the abundance of OC, with accuracies from 80% to 94%. Machine learning approaches such as classification and regression algorithms offer insight into complex data while providing agnostic insights, ultimately creating a more efficient search for OC. We applied our trained model on XRF data from Martian soil using rover‐based (PIXL) and orbital (Odyssey) data sets to produce probability predictions of OC abundance. Our predictions show a high probability that OC abundance is low which is comparable to OC data from recently landed missions. These results highlight the potential for predictive machine learning models to be trained on data from analog environments on Earth and then applied to extraterrestrial targets, ultimately, improving life detection efforts.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Floyd Nichols
A. Pontefract
Andrew L. Masterson
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Northwestern University
Georgia Institute of Technology
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nichols et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66b35b6db6435875f6ed9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jh000138
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: