Photon and neutron dose evaluation at the beam test facility of the INFN - National laboratory of Frascati

Dose evaluation and direct measurements are fundamental for radiation protection in non-conventional accelerator facilities, both before and after the primary and secondary shielding. In this paper, we will report about the experimental setup, data acquisition and analysis, together with FLUKA modeling, of the dose measurements test carried out in the Beam Test Facility (BTF) of the INFN - Frascati's National Laboratories (LNF), where an intense mixed field is produced and measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters. BTF is an extraction and transport line of DAΦNE LINAC (Buonomo et al. 2021; Mazzitelli et al. 2003). It is optimized for electrons and positrons production in a wide range of intensity, energy (30 MeV–800 MeV), beam spot dimensions and divergence, using both primary and secondary beam of the DAΦNE LINAC. Through the years, the BTF has gained an important role in particle detectors test and development with electron/positron beam. A small fraction of the BTF's shifts have been dedicated to radiation damage test using LINAC electron primary beam up to 5×1010 e-/s. As radiation protection group of the LNF, we evaluated the dose when electrons impinging on a Pb target from: (i) photon Bremsstrahlung production; (ii) photoneutron production. Three dedicated tests with 503 MeV electrons impinging on a ∼16 cm thick Pb target have been carried out in February, June 2022 and in January 2023, using TLD700 and TLD600, measuring doses at several charge intervals. The aim of this study focuses on evaluating dosimetric quantities produced by the mixed field, air kerma for the photon component, and ambient dose equivalent for the neutron one, using thermoluminescence dosimeters calibrated with low-energy standards: Cs-137 and Am-Be. The approach adopted involves the use of Monte Carlo simulations of the experiment, both to benchmark against experimental measurements and to validate the results obtained for energies higher than those of calibration. The results of this comparison show excellent agreement between measured and simulated quantities in the forward direction, allowing us to conclude and confirm the validity of the calibrations themselves.