Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
JWST has revealed a large population of ultra-violet (UV) -bright galaxies at z 10 and possibly overly massive galaxies at z 7, challenging standard galaxy formation models in the CDM cosmology. We use an empirical galaxy formation model to explore the potential of alleviating these tensions through an Early Dark Energy (EDE) model, originally proposed to solve the Hubble tension. Our benchmark model demonstrates excellent agreement with the UV luminosity functions (UVLFs) at 4 z 10 in both CDM and EDE cosmologies. In the EDE cosmology, the UVLF measurements at z 12 based on spectroscopically confirmed galaxies exhibit no tension with the benchmark model. Photometric constraints at 12 z 16 can be fully explained within EDE via either moderately increased star formation efficiencies (_ 3-10\% at M ₇₀₋₎ 10^10. 5\, M_) or enhanced UV variabilities (ₔₕ 0. 8-1. 3 mag at M ₇₀₋₎ 10^10. 5\, M_) that are within the scatter of hydrodynamical simulation predictions. A similar agreement is difficult to achieve in CDM, especially at z 14, where the required ₔₕ exceeds the maximum value seen in simulations. Furthermore, the implausibly large cosmic stellar mass densities inferred from some JWST observations are no longer in tension with cosmology when the EDE is considered. Our findings highlight EDE as an intriguing unified solution to a fundamental problem in cosmology and the recent tensions raised by JWST observations. Data at the highest redshifts reached by JWST (z 14-16) will be crucial for differentiating modified galaxy formation physics from new cosmological physics.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xuejian Shen
Mark Vogelsberger
Michael Boylan-Kolchin
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e63e20b6db6435875cfbb6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2406.15548
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: