PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 27, 2024European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging0 citations

Routine clinical reproducibility of hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 15O-water-PET

View Full Paper
MLMark LubberinkJNJonny NordströmJSJonathan Sigfridsson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Background Hyperemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) has been shown to provide the most accurate non-invasive diagnosis of hemodynamically significant CAD. A high reproducibility of hyperemic MBF measurements is important for accurate stratification of patients. Previous studies have shown that whole-myocardium hyperemic MBF measurement with 82Rb has a repeatability coefficient (RC) of 50% (1.3 mL/g/min) for a two-day test-retest using adenosine in healthy controls 1 and 21% (0.51 mL/g/min) and 38% (0.90 mL/g/min) for a single-session and two-day test-retest using dipyridamole, respectively, in patients in clinical routine 2. For 15O-water and adenosine, an RC of 25% (0.90 mL/g/min) has been reported in 1999 for healthy controls, whereas RC at the regional level was 50% 3. Purpose The aim of the current work is to assess the reproducibility of hyperemic MBF measurements with 15O-water using state of the art technology. Methods Ten patients referred for assessment of ischemia underwent a same day test-retest protocol consisting of 4-min dynamic rest and stress scans starting simultaneously with controlled bolus injection of 400 MBq 15O-water on a digital PET-CT scanner. Patients left the scanner between test and retest sessions and time between test and retest scan sessions was circa 1 h. Adenosine infusion at 140 μg/kg/min was started 2 min prior to each stress scan and continued during the entire scan. Images were analysed using fully automated software. RC (1.96 x SD of test-retest differences), mean relative test-retest difference and within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) were calculated at the whole myocardium, regional and segmental levels. Results Whole myocardium hyperemic MBF ranged from 1.3 to 4.6 mL/g/min. RC was 15% (0.43 mL/g/min), 23% (0.67) and 27% (0.80) at whole myocardium, regional and segmental levels, respectively. Mean test-retest difference was 7%, 10% and 11%, and wCV was 5.5%, 8.3% and 9.8%, respectively. Figure 1 shows scatter plots of MBF values and figure 2 shows stress MBF polarmaps of a typical patient. Conclusion Automated data analysis and use of modern PET scanners results in a large improvement of reproducibility of hyperemic MBF measurements with 15O-water. Reproducibility of hyperemic MBF with 15O-water is superior to previously published values for 82Rb.Scatter plot of test-retest MBF values Stress MBF polar maps of one subject

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lubberink et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e63126b6db6435875c34e2https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeae142.093
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Repeatability of Rest and Hyperemic Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with <sup>82</sup>Rb Dynamic PET2008 · 94 citations
  2. 2Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb positron emission tomography: clinical validation with 15O-water2012 · 110 citations
  3. 3Intra-Individual Variability of Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve Assessed by [15O]H2O-PET in Patients with Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Disease2026
  4. 4Agreement between quantitative Rubidium-82 and Oxygen-15 water PET myocardial perfusion imaging on absolute myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve2024
  5. 5Inter-Observer Reliability in Myocardial Blood Flow Measurement Using Rb-82-PET/CT2026