Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Study Objective Night work has detrimental impacts on sleep and performance, primarily due to misalignment between sleep–wake schedules and underlying circadian rhythms. This study tested whether circadian-informed lighting accelerated circadian phase delay, and thus adjustment to night work, compared to blue-depleted standard lighting under simulated submariner work conditions. Methods Nineteen healthy sleepers (12 males; mean ± SD aged 29 ± 10 years) participated in two separate 8-day visits approximately 1 month apart to receive, in random order, circadian-informed lighting (blue-enriched and dim, blue-depleted lighting at specific times) and standard lighting (dim, blue-depleted lighting). After an adaptation night (day 1), salivary dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO) assessment was undertaken from 18:00 to 02:00 on days 2–3. During days 3–7, participants completed simulated night work from 00:00 to 08:00 and a sleep period from 10:00 to 19:00. Post-condition DLMO assessment occurred from 21:00 to 13:00 on days 7–8. Ingestible capsules continuously sampled temperature to estimate daily core body temperature minimum (Tmin) time. Tmin and DLMO circadian delays were compared between conditions using mixed effects models. Results There were significant condition-by-day interactions in Tmin and DLMO delays (both p .001). After four simulated night shifts, circadian-informed lighting produced a mean 95% CI 5.6 3.0 to 8.2 hours greater delay in Tmin timing and a 4.2 3.0 to 5.5 hours greater delay in DLMO timing compared to standard lighting. Conclusions Circadian-informed lighting accelerates adjustment to shiftwork in a simulated submariner work environment. Circadian lighting interventions warrant consideration in any dimly lit and blue-depleted work environments where circadian adjustment is relevant to help enhance human performance, safety, and health.
Guyett et al. (Wed,) studied this question.