Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Households that burn biomass in inefficient open fires—a practice that results in 1. 6 trillion in global damages from health impacts and climate-altering emissions yearly—are often unable to access cleaner alternatives, like gas, which is widely available but unaffordable, or electricity, which is unattainable for many due to insufficient supply and reliability of electricity services. Governments are often reluctant to make gas affordable. We argue that condemnation of all fossil fuel subsidies is short-sighted and does not adequately consider subsidizing gas for cooking as a potential strategy to improve public health and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Carlos Gould
Rob Bailis
Kalpana Balakrishnan
Environmental Research Letters
Stanford University
University of California, Berkeley
University of California, San Diego
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gould et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e62c14b6db6435875be166 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad5d06
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: