Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
4587 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease has been established as a prognostic biomarker in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Despite the confirmed utility of ctDNA in muscle-invasive non-metastatic UC (nmUC), validation in patients with metastatic UC (mUC) remains unexplored. This study aims to prospectively assess the utility of ctDNA in nmUC and mUC Methods: This prospective study analyzed the results of longitudinal ctDNA testing in a single academic center of patients with UC. A personalized, tumor-informed, multiple PCR-NGS assay (Signatera, Natera, Inc) was used for the detection and quantification of ctDNA. A total of 203 samples were analyzed (median: 3 samples/patient) with a median follow up (mFU) from first ctDNA of 12months. nmUC and mUC patients with >1 ctDNA sample were included for analysis. Disease progression was assessed by clinical/radiographic exams. ctDNA dynamics were categorized based on clearance (ctDNA-), residual (ctDNA+), ≥50% quantitative reduction (≥50%ctDNAr), and 50%ctDNAr remained progression free at analysis (mFU:11mo) and mTTP in 8/31 patients was 9.5months. Notably, 5/9 patients with ≥50%ctDNAr who underwent treatment breaks due to adverse events remained progression free (median treatment break: 7 months, mFU:19 months). Patients with ≥50%ctDNAr and ctDNA-had significantly improved mTTP when compared to patients with <50%ctDNAr (HR 0.18, p=0.02 and HR 0.11, p=0.009 respectively). Conclusions: Our findings underscore the potential for personalized assessment of tumor-informed ctDNA dynamics as a promising prognostic biomarker in patients with both localized and metastatic UC. Further prospective studies are necessary to validate utility for ctDNA guided treatment de-escalation in mUC.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Adanma Ayanambakkam
Anh B. Lam
Niveditha Popuri
Journal of Clinical Oncology
University of California, San Diego
University of Oklahoma
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ayanambakkam et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66dd2b6db6435875f9227 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.4587
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: